TiG

TiG

Biblical Literacy

  
By:  TiG  •  Religion  •  7 years ago  •  30 comments

Biblical Literacy
Testing of the new filters.

Tags

jrBlog - desc
[]
 
TiG
expert active
1  author  TiG    7 years ago

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, sed ex nibh suscipit, eum et dico etiam iisque. Te malis dictas sed, ne qui enim epicuri. Saperet scripserit id sit, mea quodsi detraxit te. Mei fierent omnesque scaevola ex, usu te putent iisque latine, ex eam accusam indoctum prodesset. Ea mea denique elaboraret theophrastus. Te feugiat platonem his. Sea blandit adipiscing et, nam wisi vitae sapientem ad, impetus nostrum sit cu.

Te his dicunt nonumes explicari, doctus evertitur an his. Ea qui scriptorem intellegebat. Et vis saepe iudicabit periculis, vim augue summo deterruisset no. Labores intellegebat vim no, nostrum phaedrum eos ea, semper facete eirmod sea et. Eirmod integre conceptam in sea.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
1.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @1    7 years ago
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, sed ex nibh suscipit, eum et dico etiam iisque. Te malis dictas sed, ne qui enim epicuri. Saperet scripserit id sit, mea quodsi detraxit te. Mei fierent omnesque scaevola ex, usu te putent iisque latine, ex eam accusam indoctum prodesset. Ea mea denique elaboraret theophrastus. Te feugiat platonem his. Sea blandit adipiscing et, nam wisi vitae sapientem ad, impetus nostrum sit cu.

RwQ above

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
1.1.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @1.1    7 years ago
RwQ above

And some text

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
1.2  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @1    7 years ago
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, sed ex nibh suscipit, eum et dico etiam iisque. Te malis dictas sed, ne qui enim epicuri.

Above RwQ before update is fine.

Added this new line of commentary in update.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
1.3  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @1    7 years ago
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, sed ex nibh suscipit, eum et dico etiam iisque. Te malis dictas sed, ne qui enim epicuri.

My comment

Added on update.  And after a code change another update to see if it corrects things.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
1.4  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @1    7 years ago
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, sed ex nibh suscipit, eum et dico etiam iisque. Te malis dictas sed, ne qui enim epicuri. Saperet scripserit id sit, mea quodsi detraxit te. Mei fierent omnesque scaevola ex, usu te putent iisque latine, ex eam accusam indoctum prodesset. Ea mea denique elaboraret theophrastus. Te feugiat platonem his. Sea blandit adipiscing et, nam wisi vitae sapientem ad, impetus nostrum sit cu.

Normal text now

should position properly now

Above copied and pasted from another comment and manually quoted here.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
1.4.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @1.4    7 years ago
Normal text now

Normal comment (RwQ) above

Updating with this new line.   Also boldfaced text in the quote.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
2  author  TiG    7 years ago
Quote

Not

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, sed ex nibh suscipit, eum et dico etiam iisque. Te malis dictas sed, ne qui enim epicuri. Saperet scripserit id sit, mea quodsi detraxit te. Mei fierent omnesque scaevola ex, usu te putent iisque latine, ex eam accusam indoctum prodesset. Ea mea denique elaboraret theophrastus. Te feugiat platonem his. Sea blandit adipiscing et, nam wisi vitae sapientem ad, impetus nostrum sit cu.

Te his dicunt nonumes explicari, doctus evertitur an his. Ea qui scriptorem intellegebat. Et vis saepe iudicabit periculis, vim augue summo deterruisset no. Labores intellegebat vim no, nostrum phaedrum eos ea, semper facete eirmod sea et. Eirmod integre conceptam in sea.

Pasted quote above

Typed quote

Normal text

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
2.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @2    7 years ago
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, sed ex nibh suscipit, eum et dico etiam iisque. Te malis dictas sed, ne qui enim epicuri.

Quote from a quote

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
3  author  TiG    7 years ago
Saperet scripserit id sit, mea quodsi detraxit te. 

Words

Saperet scripserit id sit, mea quodsi detraxit te. 

Words

Saperet scripserit id sit, mea quodsi detraxit te. 
 
 
 
TiG
expert active
4  author  TiG    7 years ago

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
5  author  TiG    7 years ago

    

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
5.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @5    7 years ago

Just getting a 5.1 comment to check out the scrolling.

But cannot help but place a quote in here.   Will have to update this quote too to see how well it survives the update process given the new filters and the event handling wiring from the editor to ensure the filters engage regardless of the context in which the editor operates.

The above was a quote.   Editted the comment to see the behavior.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
5.1.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @5.1    7 years ago

Replying to 5.1 to again review the positioning.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
5.1.2  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @5.1    7 years ago

5.1.2

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
5.2  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @5    7 years ago

5.2

But with a quote.

And another

Not this

But this
 
 
 
TiG
expert active
5.2.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @5.2    7 years ago

5.2.1 - tiny comment

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
6  author  TiG    7 years ago

Quote

Quote

Quote

Words

Quote

Words

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
7  author  TiG    7 years ago
Te his dicunt nonumes explicari, doctus evertitur an his. Ea qui scriptorem intellegebat. Et vis saepe iudicabit periculis, vim augue summo deterruisset no. Labores intellegebat vim no, nostrum phaedrum eos ea, semper facete eirmod sea et. Eirmod integre conceptam in sea.

Above a pasted quote

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
8  author  TiG    7 years ago

The tables below are a reference to basic regex. While reading the rest of the site, when in doubt, you can always come back and look here. (It you want a bookmark, here's a direct link to the  regex reference tables ). I encourage you to print the tables so you have a cheat sheet on your desk for quick reference.

The tables are not exhaustive, for two reasons. First, every regex flavor is different, and I didn't want to crowd the page with overly exotic syntax. For a full reference to the particular regex flavors you'll be using, it's always best to go straight to the source. In fact, for some regex engines (such as Perl, PCRE, Java and .NET) you may want to check once a year, as their creators often introduce new features. 

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
8.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @8    7 years ago
The tables are not exhaustive, for two reasons. First, every regex flavor is different, and I didn't want to crowd the page with overly exotic syntax. For a full reference to the particular regex flavors you'll be using, it's always best to go straight to the source. In fact, for some regex engines (such as Perl, PCRE, Java and .NET) you may want to check once a year, as their creators often introduce new features.

RwQ by selecting text from within another quote

Copy and past from NT comments below.   Then quoted.

 
 
Tessylo
5.1.1.1      Tessylo     replied to    Jeremy Retired in NC   @ 5.1.1       10 hours ago

That's not my temper tantrum name - that's what I choose to call that fat bloated ignorant turd.  

     REPLY
 
 
magnoliaave
5.1.1.1.…      magnoliaave     replied to    Tessylo   @ 5.1.1.1       9 hours ago

Domesticated vocabulary!

     REPLY
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.2      Tessylo     replied to    magnoliaave   @ 5.1       10 hours ago

That's Donald Rump - I refuse to use his name or to call him president.  

     REPLY
 
 
 
TiG
expert active
8.2  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @8    7 years ago
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.1.1      Tessylo     replied to    Jeremy Retired in NC   @ 5.1.1       10 hours ago

That's not my temper tantrum name - that's what I choose to call that fat bloated ignorant turd.  

     REPLY
 
 
magnoliaave
5.1.1.1.…      magnoliaave     replied to    Tessylo   @ 5.1.1.1       9 hours ago

Domesticated vocabulary!

     REPLY
 
 
Tessylo
5.1.2      Tessylo     replied to    magnoliaave   @ 5.1       10 hours ago

That's Donald Rump - I refuse to use his name or to call him president.  

     REPLY
 
 
 
TiG
expert active
10  author  TiG    7 years ago

Entering in some text to test the editor

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
10.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @10    7 years ago
Entering in some text to test the editor

Now a more full test

quote

quote

quote

Not a quote

quote
 
 
 
TiG
expert active
10.2  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @10    7 years ago
Entering in some text to test the editor

RwQ above

My own quote here

Some text - updated

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
10.3  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @10    7 years ago

10.3 to test repositioning.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
11  author  TiG    7 years ago

The following is pasted from another website but quoted here using the Quote button.

The tables below are a reference to basic regex. While reading the rest of the site, when in doubt, you can always come back and look here. (It you want a bookmark, here's a direct link to the  regex reference tables ). I encourage you to print the tables so you have a cheat sheet on your desk for quick reference.

The tables are not exhaustive, for two reasons. First, every regex flavor is different, and I didn't want to crowd the page with overly exotic syntax. For a full reference to the particular regex flavors you'll be using, it's always best to go straight to the source. In fact, for some regex engines (such as Perl, PCRE, Java and .NET) you may want to check once a year, as their creators often introduce new features. 

This is text from me.

This is my typing in a quote

Followed by another quote

Followed by some text prior to another external website paste and quote.

(It you want a bookmark, here's a direct link to the  regex reference tables ).

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
11.1  author  TiG  replied to  TiG @11    7 years ago

11.1 - should position properly now.

 
 
 
TiG
expert active
12  author  TiG    7 years ago
It emphasizes the utter lack of respect you consistently put on display for spirituality and religion points of view.

When I challenge claims I do so with a matter-of-fact comment.   No FSM nonsense or equivalent.   As Sandy has noted several times ...

... if their value cannot be demonstrated?

If there is no evidence of something then when someone claims that something exists the natural question is to ask where they are getting their information.   If God exists and is communicating with human beings then we really (certainly by now) should have amazing evidence to support this.   UPDATED

 
 
 
Harpo
experienced silent
13  Harpo    6 years ago

commenter update